Yrd. Doç. Dr.
Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji
3 Temmuz 1984 yılında Ortaköy Lefkoşa’da doğdu. 1990-1995 yılları arasında Fikri Karayel İlkokulu’nu daha sonra 1995-1998’de Şehit Hüseyin Ruso Ortaokulu’nu tamamladı. Lise eğitimine Lefkoşa Türk Maarif Koleji’nde devam etti. 2001-2007 Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi’nde İngilizce Tıp Bölümü’nü bitirdi.2008-2013 ‘de Trakya Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi’nde Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı üzerine uzmanlık aldı.
Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji
Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji
Trakya Üniversitesi
-
-
Tıp
Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fak.
Minor trauma may cause hip dislocation in young children because of physiologic hip joint laxity and the soft cartilaginous structure of the acetabulum. In this work, we report on a 22-month-old boy with right-sided traumatic posterior hip dislocation and ipsilateral distal femoral fracture because of an outdoor motor vehicle accident. The patient was treated with emergency closed reduction and one and a half hip spica under general anaesthesia. The femoral fracture and hip dislocation were healed smoothly without any complication. Traumatic hip dislocation is rare in children, which may occur after trivial trauma. Prognosis is better in younger patients with low-energy trauma and in cases treated early.
-
Abstract The appearance of displaced bone inferior (distal) to the medial malleolus, present on radiographs in an adolescent patient, can be confused with a fracture, when, in fact, it is the radiographic appearance of a secondary center of ossification. Foot and ankle surgeons should be aware of extra ossification centers and accessory bones, including one at the tip of the medial malleolus, to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment. In the present report, I describe the case of a 9-year-old male with bilateral extra ossification centers at the tip of each medial malleolus.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Abstract Background Several femoral fixation devices for hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are available but the best technique is unclear. Purpose We hypothesized that different suspensory femoral fixation techniques have no superiority to each other. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical results of different suspensory femoral fixation devices in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Study design Level III, retrospective comparative study. Methods 100 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in a single institution with 40 months (12–67 months) mean follow-up time were divided into three groups according to femoral fixation devices as ‘Endobutton’ (n:34), ‘Transfix’ (n:35) and ‘Aperfix’ (n:31). Length of painful period after surgery, time to return occupation and sporting activities, final range of motion, anterior drawer and Lachman tests, knee instability symptoms, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation (IKDC) score, Short Form 36 (SF 36) score, Lysholm knee score and Tegner point of the patients were evaluated and compared between groups. Results There were no significant differences between the groups. All techniques resulted in significant recovery in knee instability tests and symptoms. Conclusion In this study, the clinical results of different suspensory femoral fixation techniques were found to be similar. We believed that different femoral fixation techniques have no effect on clinical results as long as the technique is correctly applied. Appropriate technique should be preferred according to surgeon's experience.
-
-
-