Abstract

-

Özet

-

Abstract

“Everyone should have a nationality”, “everyone should have only one nationality” and “everyone should have the right to choose and change his nationality” , are the “generally ac- cepted” principles of nationality law. In the course of history, the second of these principles has, to a certain degree, lost its value. In our work, firstly the concept of “nationality” and the sourcess of na- tionality law will be disscused. After that various types of the natio- nality will be examined in the light of the Turkish and Cypriot Turkish Laws with a comparative approach. In the conclusion, the Turkish and Cypriot Turkish Laws will be examined comparatively in general; bearing in the mind the three main principles of nationality law.

Özet

“Herkesin mutlaka bir vatandaşlığı olmalıdır”, “herkesin yalnız bir vatandaşlığı olmalıdır” ve “herkes vatandaşlığını seçme ve değiştirmede özgür olmalıdır”, vatandaşlık hukukunun, “evrensel olarak kabul görmüş” üç temel ilkesi olma niteliğini haizdir. Vatan- daşlık hukukunun tarihi gelişimi içerisinde, söz konusu ilkelerden ikincisi önem açısından “zayı amış”, değer kaybetmiştir. Çalışma- mızda ilk olarak, vatandaşlık kavramı ve vatandaşlık hukukunun kaynakları ele alınacak, ardından ise, mukayeseli çalışmamızın ana temasına uygun şekilde, Türk Hukukunda ve Kıbrıs Türk Hukukunda vatandaşlık türleri incelenecektir. Son olarak ise çalışmamızın temel konusunu oluşturan, Türk Hukuku ve Kıbrıs Türk Hukukunda, vatan- daşlık hukuku temel ilkelerinin etkileri ele alınarak, ayrıntılı olarak değerlendirilecektir.

Abstract

Copyright issues for artists, writers, academics, etc. have a high degree of importance, as they serve to protect the person or persons as the creator. If protection is not provided through copyrights, the unauthorized use of the art work or works violates the rights of the artist as the creator. The artist whose rights are violated may lose the will to create; this is an undesirable situation. In the UK (Common Law) and Turkey (Turkish Law), which will be dealt with in order to compare our work with the Turkish Cypriot Law, the copyright is protected under certain measures; our focus is in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (Turkish Cypriot Law), there is a copyright law of 1918, consisting of only four articles. The current regulations are insufficient to overcome this issue. In order to overcome this issue, we will offer various solutions.

Özet

Abstract

Negotiations on a settlement of the Cyprus problem, which has a history of about 50 years, are still in progress. In 2014, a new period of negotiations started under the leadership of Akıncı and Anastasiadis. In 2017, discussions were held in Geneva with the aim of achieving peace and an ultimate resolution to the Cyprus problem. However, the Geneva talks failed due to the parties’ disagreements on a number of matters. In this article, the authors provide a brief history of Cyprus negotiations, followed by an assessment of the 2016-2017 Geneva talks as part of the new negotiation period. In this context, the key points of the Geneva talks, which were agreed upon by the parties, are discussed.

Özet

-